A too-general TOK example leaves you describing a topic instead of proving a knowledge claim with a precise case.
Teardown of a Too-General TOK Example
Spot the General Example
Let's teardown a too-general TOK example: 'In history, people interpret the past differently.' This sounds TOK-related, but it is not yet an example. It is a broad statement. If you put it into a paragraph, you will probably write general comments about bias, perspective, and sources without proving anything specific.
Find the Missing Detail
The first problem is that there is no exact case. Which historical event? Which interpretation? Which source? Which historian or group? Without a case, the paragraph has no anchor. Fix one: choose a specific moment where interpretation changed or was contested. For example, the use of newly available archives to reinterpret a political decision, or a debate about the reliability of eyewitness testimony in a particular event.